Sunday, December 22, 2019

The service, known as MI5, argued that sources sometimes had to be allowed to break the law so that officers could prevent more serious offenses. Critics say the policy offers de facto impunity.

from NYT > Top Stories https://ift.tt/2ZefEft

Related Posts:

  • LATEST NEWSKaty Waldman reviews Elvia Wilk’s novel “Oval,” in which earth, capitalism, and the human species sink toward doom. from Everything http://bit.ly/2JTiEYR … Read More
  • LATEST NEWSFrank Cotham’s Daily Cartoon gives the President some advice. from Everything http://bit.ly/2WeChBr … Read More
  • LATEST NEWSAmy Davidson Sorkin writes about the muddled politics of royal succession and the choice of Bran Stark as King of the Six Kingdoms of Westeros in the series finale of “Game of Thrones.” from Everything http://bit.ly/2QgY1Hf … Read More
  • LATEST NEWSJohn Cassidy writes about the proposed merger between Sprint and T-Mobile, and how the Trump Administration is putting big corporations ahead of consumers. from Everything http://bit.ly/2WjWjdH … Read More
  • LATEST NEWSBrian Dillon on work of the the Surrealist photographer Dora Maar, who had a relationship with the artist Pablo Picasso and documented the painting of “Guernica.” from Everything http://bit.ly/2EoYmD0 … Read More

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Followers

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Popular Posts

FOLLOW BY EMAIL

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner