The president’s legal case would negate any need for witnesses. But constitutional scholars say that it’s wrong.
from NYT > Top Stories https://ift.tt/2RyRskp
Tuesday, January 21, 2020
Tuesday, January 21, 2020
MZ Digital Marketing Agency
OTHER NEWS
No comments
Related Posts:
LATEST NEWSNatalie Meade recommends “Part of My Soul,” which offers letters, interviews, and testimonies that document Winnie Mandela‘s fight against apartheid South Africa. from Everything https://ift.tt/2ODqc24 … Read More
LATEST NEWSTroy Patterson writes about Terence Nance’s late-night show on HBO, which includes a collage of sketches, music videos, and features appearances by Black Thought and Jon Hamm. from Everything https://ift.tt/2n4VT7R … Read More
LATEST NEWSDavid Sipress’s Daily Cartoon anticipates the 2018 midterms. from Everything https://ift.tt/2n6Bwaw … Read More
LATEST NEWSRichard Brody reviews “The Miseducation of Cameron Post,” the Iranian-American director Desiree Akhavan’s new film, about gay teens in a Christian conversion-therapy center. from Everything https://ift.tt/2LX6MGM … Read More
LATEST NEWSTamara Shopsin humorously illustrates a typography of bugs. from Everything https://ift.tt/2AwM5Ni … Read More
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment